| |

|
|
The Supervisor Pay Scam:
How the County Board Misled
Taxpayers
Part 1 (Includes comparison to City of Milwaukee
Common Council)
Audit Director Jerome Heer is one of Milwaukee
County's most dedicated managers. He along with other
managers like Director of Administrative Services Rob Henken
and recently retired head of the County Election Commission
Janice Dunn are the kind of people who keep the county afloat
despite the best attempts of some politicians to run it
aground.
Naturally, we were surprised to hear of the
Audit Department report that backed up the county board's "low
pay lament" and the wailings of Supervisor James "Luigi"
Schmitt. When CRG read the report we knew something was
up so we called on Director Heer who provided us with a copy of
his department's working papers for the 2002, 2004, and recent
2007 review of supervisor pay. The facts were all there.
Unfortunately, the county board and Supervisor Schmitt
conveniently withheld vital information which paints a
completely different picture about supervisor pay.
Here is the Part 1 of "the rest of the story."
Great Facts Versus Sloppy Spin
One would think that with all the problems facing
the county that the Audit Department would have better things to do
besides helping supervisors increase their pay. Nonetheless,
they are at the beckon call of the county board and know better than
to get in the way of a politician and a pay raise. As a
result, they did a first class job, pouring hours of research into
finding 18 comparable municipalities (including the City of Milwaukee
Common Council) to use in evaluating supervisor pay - as indicated
by the mountainous stack of working papers we uncovered. The
counties on the list fall into a reasonably narrow band of governmental
jurisdictions based on budget and population. Here is the
list.
|
Jurisdiction |
Population |
Budget |
2007 Salary |
Salary Rank |
|
Ventura County (Ventura, CA) |
753,197 |
$1,540,000,000 |
$113,338 |
1 |
|
Fresno County (Fresno, CA) |
799,407 |
$1,487,762,116 |
$102,989 |
2 |
|
Contra Costa County (Martinez, CA |
948,816 |
$1,656,342,056 |
$95,568 |
3 |
|
Sacramento County (Sacramento, CA) |
1,223,499 |
$654,800,000 |
$94,406 |
4 |
|
Palm Beach County (West Palm Beach) |
1,131,184 |
$3,679,132,932 |
$91,996 |
5 |
|
Pinellas County (Clearwater, FL) |
928,032 |
$741,763,140 |
$90,928 |
6 |
|
Hennepin County (Minneapolis, MN) |
1,116,200 |
$2,001,458,677 |
$90,276 |
7 |
|
Franklin County (Columbus, OH) |
1,090,771 |
$1,460,000,000 |
$89,955 |
8 |
|
Prince George County (Upper Marlboro, MD) |
862,267 |
$2,177,596,700 |
$89,000 |
9 |
|
Hamilton County (Cincinnati, OH) |
806,652 |
$1,180,000,000 |
$84,703 |
10 |
|
City of Milwaukee |
578,887 |
$1,230,000,000 |
$71,506 |
11 |
|
Wayne County (Detroit) |
2,061,162 |
$2,060,000,000 |
$68,676 |
12 |
|
Pima County (Tucson, AZ) |
1,000,000 |
$1,316,220,562 |
$67,800 |
13 |
|
Milwaukee County |
921,654 |
$1,200,000,000 |
$50,874 |
14 |
|
DuPage County (Wheaton, IL) |
904,161 |
$474,100,100 |
$48,680 |
15 |
|
Macomb County (Mt. Clemens, MI) |
788,149 |
$449,000,000 |
$34,068 |
16 |
|
Oakland County (Pontiac, MI) |
1,214,361 |
$743,820,052 |
$33,448 |
17 |
|
St. Louis County (St. Louis, MO) |
1,016,315 |
$487,411,360 |
$15,625 |
18 |
|
Marion County (Indianapolis, IN) |
863,133 |
$1,100,000,000 |
$15,276 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
1,000,413 |
$1,349,442,510 |
$71,006 |
|
Note that the average population and budget of this
list is extremely close to that of Milwaukee County suggesting a
great match for doing a comparison. Also note that based on
this simple comparison, poor old Milwaukee County is mired in 14th
place in supervisory salary rank. Armed with this slim data
set, Super Supervisor Schmitt flies into action and announces it will
take a 40% increase in supervisor pay just to bring the downtrodden
Milwaukee County Supervisors to the middle of the pack at $71,000
per year. But, it seems old "Lucky Luigi" left a few important
facts out.
A Little More Information Please
Let's try this again again after adding a few more salient facts to
"Slick Schmitt's" table. For example, let's consider how many
supervisors each "comparable" county has and what their total
expenditure is for supervisor salaries.
|
Jurisdiction |
2007 Salary |
# Supvs |
Total Salary |
Total Salary Rank |
|
City of Milwaukee |
$71,506 |
15 |
$1,072,590 |
1 |
|
Wayne County (Detroit) |
$68,676 |
15 |
$1,030,140 |
2 |
|
Milwaukee County |
$50,874 |
19 |
$966,606 |
3 |
|
Macomb County (Mt. Clemens, MI) |
$34,068 |
26 |
$885,768 |
4 |
|
Du Page County (Wheaton, IL) |
$48,680 |
18 |
$876,240 |
5 |
|
Oakland County (Pontiac, MI) |
$33,448 |
25 |
$836,200 |
6 |
|
Prince George County (Upper Marlboro, MD) |
$89,000 |
9 |
$801,000 |
7 |
|
Pinellas County (Clearwater, FL) |
$90,928 |
7 |
$636,496 |
8 |
|
Hennepin County (Minneapolis, MN) |
$90,276 |
7 |
$631,932 |
9 |
|
Hamilton County (Cincinnati, OH) |
$84,703 |
7 |
$592,921 |
10 |
|
Ventura County (Ventura, CA) |
$113,338 |
5 |
$566,690 |
11 |
|
Palm Beach County (West Palm Beach) |
$91,996 |
6 |
$551,976 |
12 |
|
Fresno County (Fresno, CA) |
$102,989 |
5 |
$514,945 |
13 |
|
Contra Costa County (Martinez, CA |
$95,568 |
5 |
$477,840 |
14 |
|
Sacramento County (Sacramento, CA) |
$94,406 |
5 |
$472,030 |
15 |
|
Marion County (Indianapolis, IN) |
$15,276 |
29 |
$443,004 |
16 |
|
Pima County (Tucson, AZ) |
$67,800 |
5 |
$339,000 |
17 |
|
Franklin County (Columbus, OH) |
$89,955 |
3 |
$269,865 |
18 |
|
St. Louis County (St. Louis, MO) |
$15,625 |
7 |
$109,375 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
$71,006 |
11.5 |
$635,506 |
|
Oh my, Milwaukee County jumps near the top of the list in total
supervisory salary. In fact, had the City of Milwaukee not
occupied the #1 spot (do we see a trend here) our poor poverty level
"supes" would be in the #2 spot! Hey, Luigi, here's a
newsflash. Want to double your pay? Then just cut the
size of the county board in half so it is "comparable" to the
average of the rest of the nation! Figure it out, everybody
else does what you do with half the number of supervisors.
You Earn What You Are Worth
But why stop with one simple counterpoint?
Let's keep adding more data. Heck, you don't even need the
Audit Department data if you can use the Internet (although we must
admit, it was much easier to use their data - after all, the
taxpayers did pay for it). Now, let's compare the
constituent workload of our bone-weary county servants.
|
Jurisdiction |
Supvs |
Population |
Constituent Load |
Load Rank |
|
Franklin County (Columbus, OH) |
3 |
1,090,771 |
363,590 |
1 |
|
Sacramento County (Sacramento, CA) |
5 |
1,223,499 |
244,700 |
2 |
|
Pima County (Tucson, AZ) |
5 |
1,000,000 |
200,000 |
3 |
|
Contra Costa County (Martinez, CA |
5 |
948,816 |
189,763 |
4 |
|
Palm Beach County (West Palm Beach) |
6 |
1,131,184 |
188,531 |
5 |
|
Fresno County (Fresno, CA) |
| |